661 NY Hasidic Jews bash Gay Black man, but are not charged with Hate Crime. Sweden's war on Hate Speech

NY Hasidic Jews bash Gay Black man, but are not charged with Hate Crime.
Sweden's war on Hate Speech

Newsletter published on 30-04-2014

(1) NY Hasidic Jews bash Gay Black man, but are not charged with Hate Crime
(2) Hasidic attackers yell anti-Gay epithets: "stay down, f----t, stay
the f--- down"
(3) Brooklyn district attorney did not charge Hasidic attackers with
hate crimes - NYT
(4) Holder pledges Hate Crimes Cooperation with ADL
(5) Australian "minority" ethnic groups mobilize to fight changes to
Hate Speech laws
(6) FBI Hate Crimes webpage deletes "resources" links to SPLC & ADL
(7) ADL was founded to contest the conviction of Atlanta B’nai B’rith
President Leo Frank for Sex Murder of 13-year-old girl
(8) Sweden's war on Hate Speech
(9) Sweden has become a totalitarian state. "Progressives" rule; only
minorities are recognized
(10) Football Association gets its anti-racist knickers in a twist over
Quenelle
(11) Dieudonée and the Global Jewish Assault on Free Speech

(1) NY Hasidic Jews bash Gay Black man, but are not charged with Hate Crime
From: ReporterNotebook <RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:55:12 -0400
Subject: "'No Hate Crime' When Jews Beat Up Black Gay" - by Rev. Ted Pike

http://truthtellers.org/alerts/No-Hate-Crime-When-Jews-Beat-Up-Black-Gay.html

"No Hate Crime" when Jews Beat Up Black Gay

By Rev. Ted Pike

29 Apr 14

Government officials described the recent alleged murder of three
non-Jews in Kansas by former KKK leader Frazier Glenn Cross as a "hate
crime"—though no Jews were killed. His intention to kill Jews, said
officials, is enough for indictment under the federal Matthew Shephard
Hate Crimes Prevention Act. This means he could be punished three times
more harshly than if he had killed the same people without anti-Semitic
feelings.

Yet last week the justice system had a very different response to a
similarly violent hate crime.

In December 2013, black, homosexual student Taj Patterson was violently
assaulted in Brooklyn by Jewish "shomrim" (security police) who are
Ultra-Orthodox and thus strongly oppose homosexuality. The attackers,
who blinded Patterson in one eye, shouted anti-homosexual epithets.

  But a New York Grand Jury ruled last week that the five attackers will
not be charged with a hate crime, only civil penalties. Jewish watchdog
group, "Failed Messiah," describes the attack:

Members of the patrol detained Patterson while investigating neighbors’
reports that he had damaged cars; however, they did not call the police.
Despite the fact that these reports of vandalism proved to be unfounded,
the group, which had grown to approximately 15 members, surrounded
Patterson, preventing him from continuing his walk home. When Patterson
tried to get away from the group, he was held down, and savagely punched
and kicked by a number of the males surrounding him, including these
defendants. Patterson sustained injuries to his head and body, the most
serious of which was a torn retina and a broken eye socket, causing him
to lose vision in his right eye. The beating ceased only when passersby
arrived and threatened to take pictures of the group assaulting
Patterson. All of the assailants fled the scene, leaving Patterson on
the ground injured. None of the attackers were present when the police
and an ambulance responded to 911 calls.

The District Attorney said that a Kings County grand jury has indicted
the following (5) defendants...for acting in concert to commit Gang
Assault in the First Degree, and other related charges. If convicted,
the defendants each face up to 25 years in prison.

Why are these defendants not charged with a hate crime for a clearly
bias-motivated assault against a person who has not one but two
identities—black and homosexual—specially protected under the federal
hate law? They committed the crime while shouting their bias for all to
hear! If these were white attackers, yelling "homophobic" slurs while
beating a black homosexual, it would have been front-page news across
the nation and resulted in hate crime charges for all attackers. But
these assailants face no tripled penalties, no hate crime charges. Why?
Because they are Jewish.

In 2009, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnziaXfYhc4> Attorney General
Eric Holder informed the Senate Judiciary Committee that Jews who commit
hate crimes, with other ethnic minorities, homosexuals, Muslims, and
even women, will not be prosecuted under the Matthew Shepard Act. They
will only face civil penalties. White men and Christians, however, face
possible triple penalties—even if they fail, as did Cross, to harm
members of federally protected groups; all that is necessary to be
convicted of a hate crimes charge is a crime and bias against members of
a federally protected group.

Indictment of the five Shomrim attackers without hate crimes charges
contrasts sharply with the quickness of the government to label, indict,
and prosecute 15 Amish Christians in 2012 for the "hate crime" of
forcibly shaving the heads of theological rivals. Although no one was
hurt, the FBI and US Justice Department were proud to have "served
justice" by meting triple penalty prison sentences of up to 15 years for
15 Amish adults, disrupting families and effectively orphaning any
children. (See
<http://truthtellers.org/alerts/Convicted_Amish_Are_Not_Hate_Criminals.html>Convicted
Amish Are Not "Hate Criminals")

Conspiracy to Ensnare Christians

Who contrived such twisted, discriminatory laws? The Jewish
Anti-Defamation League proudly boasts that "Our legal experts pioneered
hate crime laws and work to implement them nationwide."
("<http://www.adl.org/assets/pdf/about-adl/Annual_Report_2011.pdf>
Problems to Solutions: Building a Better World, ADL Annual Report,"
<http://adl.org>adl.org). ADL continues to argue in court against
efforts by lawyers for the Amish to overturn their defendants’
convictions. It supports without compromise the fifteen year sentence
meted to Sam Mullet, patriarch of the beard cutting Mullet clan, as just
and proportional to the offence.

ADL’s goal in more than 60 nations and 45 US states which have adopted
its hate laws is sinister. They aim to arrest Christians and members of
the political right as often as possible, stacking the legal systems
with indictments and convictions of those of a traditionalist,
nationalist, or anti-Zionist perspective—while being careful no Jew is
ever indicted for a hate crime. This creates a legal record testifying
that Christians and conservatives are notoriously inclined toward hate
and violence, while Jews are not. Jews are victims of Christian hate.
Someday, when ADL’s hate crime gestapos really bite down on the right,
innumerable legal precedents will be available to prosecutors against
Christians and patriots, but virtually none against Jews. Jesus
prophesied that in times of persecution preceding his Second Coming,
anti-Christ Jews will judge Christians in their synagogues and deliver
them to prison. (Matt. 10:17)

The case of Taj Patterson reveals that of three privileged groups under
the federal hate law, Jews are given the highest privilege of all. Hate
laws—which were, according to ADL, conceived, written, and implemented
by Jews—make members of their tribe the most protected of protected
groups. Under ADL hate laws, "equality and justice for all" has been
replaced by a new prosecutorial credo: preferential treatment for Jews,
no mercy for Christians.

The fact that Taj Patterson, a member of two usually highly protected
groups, blacks and homosexuals, cannot obtain hate crimes justice and
protection, certainly also puts blacks and homosexuals in the category
of second-class citizens. Where does that then put lowly whites, males,
Christians, and members of the Christian/conservative and anti-Zionist
right? We are now third-class citizens.

This is a reminder that Jewish Supremacists, making use of blacks,
homosexuals, even Zionist Christians, have no real love for any of these
groups. They are fodder for Zionist world ambitions. They are
expendable. The sooner all of these factions realize they are being
exploited, and work to roll back a half century of freedom-destroying
hate laws, the safer we all will be.

(2) Hasidic attackers yell anti-Gay epithets: "stay down, f----t, stay
the f--- down"
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/men-arrested-israel-bias-attack-gay-black-man-article-1.1766106

Five men arrested for gang assault against black gay Brooklyn man: sources

Taj Patterson, 22, was brutally assaulted last December as he headed
home from a night of partying in Williamsburg.

BY OREN YANIV , ROCCO PARANSCANDOLA / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Published: Wednesday, April 23, 2014, 11:44 AM/ Updated: Wednesday,
April 23, 2014, 4:42 PM

Five Hasidic men were arrested Wednesday for a disturbing attack against
a gay black man in a case initially investigated as a bias attack,
police sources said.

Fashion student Taj Patterson, 22, has said he was headed to his Fort
Greene home after a night of partying last December when over a dozen
ultra-Orthodox men assaulted him on Flushing Ave. in Williamsburg while
shouting anti-gay epithets.

Aharon Hollender, 28, Abraham Winkler, 39, Mayer Herskovic, 21, Pinchas
Braver, 19, and Joseph Fried, 25, were charged with gang assault and
other counts, but not with any hate crimes, authorities said Wednesday.

"We simply cannot allow anyone walking on the streets of Brooklyn to be
knocked to the ground, stomped and brutally beaten," said Brooklyn
district attorney Kenneth Thompson.

The group, at least two of whom belonged to a volunteer patrol called
Shomrim, were looking for someone who vandalized cars in the area and
stopped Patterson, prosecutors said.

Even though the vandalism report was unfounded, they allegedly started
pummeling the victim, authorities said.

"These indictments send a clear message that acts of vigilantism are
unacceptable and cannot be condoned by the NYPD," Police Commissioner
Bill Bratton said in a statement.

Patterson suffered a broken eye socket, a torn retina, blood clotting,
and cuts and bruises to his knee and ankles.

The main instigator kicked him in the face, yelling "stay down, f----t,
stay the f--- down," as others cheered, Patterson recalled.

"And that’s really all I can remember of that," he had told the Daily News.

The victim couldn’t be reached Wednesday.

"This is news to us," said a man who answered the phone at Patterson’s
home when asked about the arrests.

All five suspects were arraigned in Brooklyn Supreme Court Wednesday
afternoon and released on bails ranging from $50,000 and $25,000. They
face up to 25 years in prison if convicted.

Joseph Fried, 25, was among the four men arrested for allegedly beating
Patterson last December.

Prosecutor Charles Guria identified Herskovic as the main attacker and
sources said Winkler and Hollander are Shomrim members while the others
are mere "wannabes."

"This was a media frenzy and a community frenzy so some of the facts
have been skewed," said defense lawyer George Farkas, who represents
Winkler.

This isn’t the first brush with the law for at least one of those in
custody: Fried was busted in November 2012 for snapping a photo of a sex
abuse victim testifying during a high-profile trial.

While charges against a co-defendant weirdly named Lemon Juice were
recently dismissed, the case against Fried, who works for the official
newspaper of the Satmar sect, is still pending..

With Thomas Tracy oyaniv@nydailynews.com

(3) Brooklyn district attorney did not charge Hasidic attackers with
hate crimes - NYT

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/nyregion/five-men-are-charged-in-a-brooklyn-beating.html?_r=0

Five Men Are Charged in a Brooklyn Beating

By J. DAVID GOODMAN

APRIL 23, 2014

Five men who prosecutors said were associated with a Hasidic
neighborhood watch group in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, were indicted on
Wednesday in connection with a brutal beating of a gay black man in
December.

The men — Abraham Winkler, 39; Aharon Hollander, 28; Mayer Herskovic,
21; Joseph Fried, 25; and Pinchas Braver, 19 — were charged with
assault, gang assault and unlawful imprisonment for setting upon Taj
Patterson, 23, whom they suspected of vandalism. All five defendants
pleaded not guilty and have been released on bail.

A spokesman for the patrol, Joseph Pollack, said in a statement that
"reports that all five defendants indicted today are members of our
organization are not true, and the acts alleged in these indictments are
contrary to our mission and our membership." He did not say whether any
of those arrested were members.

The attack and subsequent arrests recalled an era of heightened tension
between Jewish and black residents of Brooklyn that has largely
dissipated in recent years, and elected leaders moved quickly to head
off any potential rifts. Letitia James, the public advocate, commended
"our communities for remaining united in the face of violence."

The Police Department’s hate crimes unit had been investigating the
attack. "It was a very serious crime with incredibly serious injuries
caused to the victim," Commissioner William J. Bratton said on Wednesday
before the last of the suspects had been arrested. "We initially looked
at it as a potential hate crime."

But Kenneth P. Thompson, the Brooklyn district attorney, did not charge
any of the men with hate crimes, a possible indication that no witnesses
could be located who heard statements suggesting that bias was a motive.

The attack occurred in the early morning hours of Dec. 1 on Flushing
Avenue. The men, described by prosecutors as associates of the
Williamsburg Safety Patrol Unit, also known as a shomrim, had been
responding to reports from neighbors that a man had been damaging cars
in the area. No one called the police.

There they came upon Mr. Patterson, who was passing through on his way
home to Fort Greene. Believing him to be the vandal, the men chased Mr.
Patterson down the avenue before cornering and detaining him.

As they conducted their own investigation into the vandalism reports —
reports that the police would later deem unfounded — Mr. Patterson tried
to leave, prosecutors said. By that time, a crowd of more than a dozen
had gathered.

It was then, prosecutors said, that members of the crowd held down Mr.
Patterson as others, including the men charged, punched and kicked him,
breaking an eye socket and causing him to lose vision in his right eye.

They stopped, the authorities said, only when a city bus driver
intervened and threatened to take photographs of the assailants. The men
fled. The police said the first 911 call reporting the assault came in
around 5:45 a.m.

Harold Baker, the lawyer for Mr. Fried, said he planned to fight the
charges.

"I believe Mr. Fried was mistakenly identified in this case," he said.

Another lawyer, Michael Farkas, said that his client, Mr. Hollander, was
a member of the patrol and that prosecutors had "inaccurately and
unfairly characterized" the situation. Lawyers for the other defendants
could not be reached.

Mr. Patterson could not be reached for comment. His father declined to
address the arrests, but said his son was "doing good."

Ashley Southall contributed reporting.

A version of this article appears in print on April 24, 2014, on page
A24 of the New York edition with the headline: Five Men Are Charged in a
Brooklyn Beating.

(4) Holder pledges Hate Crimes Cooperation with ADL
http://rense.com/general88/holder.htm

By Rev. Ted Pike

11-12-9

Att. Gen. Eric Holder, featured speaker at the Anti-Defamation League's
American Heritage Dinner on October 17, praised ADL for its historic
role in fighting all forms of intolerance and helping make the federal
hate crimes law a reality. He called passage of ADL's hate bill a
"marvelous step of progress" and gratefully looks forward to close and
continued cooperation with ADL in hate law implementation. ADL recently
announced that, having spearheaded passage of The Matthew Shepard and
James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act, it will now lead stage two, a
massive national campaign to train lawyers to become hate crimes
prosecutors.

Holder says that, having been personally frustrated over the past 11
years in his efforts to help pass the hate bill, as Attorney General he
is determined to begin immediate enforcement. ". . .the new hate crimes
legislation will arrive not a moment too soon. And on the day that it
becomes law, we will hasten to begin using it."

Here are highlights of Holder's speech - full of praise for ADL - and
misrepresentations concerning the new hate law and the alleged "epidemic
of hate" it claims to address.

"You - the members of the Anti-Defamation League - and I go way back. I
first began convening meetings with members of the ADL in the early 90's
when I served as the United States Attorney in Washington, D.C. . . At
that time I expressed my deep appreciation for the fact that you always
have served as indispensable allies in some of the most important work
our government does. And now, tonight, I once more have the opportunity
to stand in solidarity with you, and to thank you for your constant,
steadfast work to create a better country. A country free of
discrimination; a country free of violence; a country free of hate. The
Obama Administration could ask no better partner than the
Anti-Defamation League as we jointly strive to attain the ideals of
equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice for all. Members of
the ADL - I salute you."

Equal rights for all? That's not what Holder said in testimony before
the Senate Judiciary Committee this spring. He asserted that the hate
bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals,
policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said,
such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will
benefit under this new law. (See video "Holder Admits No Equality Under
Hate Bill" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnziaXfYhc4).

In Holder's speech to the ADL he continues this charade, asserting that
under America's new hate law "we will also continue to defend vigilantly
the civil rights of all [italics mine] people in this country and
prosecute criminal acts of discrimination wherever we find them." "The
new law expands the list of protected categories beyond race, color,
religion or national origin, and for the first time, allows the federal
government to prosecute violence undertaken because of the actual or
perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability of
any person."

Holder gives every impression, as ADL did through 19 years of hyping
their hate bills to state and federal legislators, that all Americans
are protected under hate laws according to "race, color, religion, or
national origin." In reality, ADL never intended any of its hate laws in
America - or throughout the world - to protect anyone except those
groups ADL considers victims of white, Christian, male, heterosexual
civilization.

Holder goes on to note that "the desperate need for a strengthened
federal law enforcement capability against hate crimes has been
perfectly clear." Perfectly clear? Holder was grilled repeatedly by
Republican Senators during his Judiciary testimony, asking him to make
perfectly clear if states are failing to adequately punish hate
criminals. Holder couldn't present even one example of such failure on
the local level. What is perfectly clear is that there exists no
"desperate need" for federal takeover of local law enforcement.

Further, Holder said that about 7,500 hate crimes a year since 1990,
averaging one every hour of the day, "is a staggering figure. .
.completely unacceptable." Actually, out of an average of 11 million
crimes annually reported by police to the FBI, alleged hate crimes
average only 1/10 of one percent - hardly a level of criminal activity
of the epidemic proportion portrayed by Holder and ADL. Less than five
percent of these reported hate crimes have ever been established as fact
by courts of law, yet Holder says the level of unreported level of hate
crimes in America is probably "in the tens of thousands. This fact is
enough to make one's blood run cold." Fact? How credible is an Attorney
General who regards such undocumented speculation as "fact?"

This spring, ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center in their MIAC
advisory to the Missouri State Police warned police to be suspicious of
immigration protestors as possible domestic terrorists. Holder praises
ADL for such proactive vigilance. "The ADL has done important work
documenting increased activity by hate groups who recruit members using
virulent, anti-immigration rhetoric that they present as legitimate
opinion. Such language can have a devastating effect not just on an
individual, but on an entire community."

Entire communities devastated? All ADL pro-hate law propaganda from
America to Europe to Australia allege that a hate crime is worthy of at
least triple penalties because it savages not only the victim but "tears
whole communities apart." Such may have occurred in some instances
during post-reconstruction lynchings in the American South. But when was
the last time you read of such social devastation resulting from a hate
crime in America? The very worst examples of hate crimes the ADL can put
forward are the namesakes of the federal bill: the brutal murders of
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd. Nevertheless, these had no such
devastating effect upon homosexual or black communities in Wyoming or
Texas. The social devastation which ADL claims results from states
failing to prosecute hate crimes is a figment of ADL imagination.

Holder says, "The stubborn persistence of anti-Semitism saddens me" What
is anti-Semitism? ADL's Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State
Department says "anti-Semitism" means any "strong criticism" of Israel
or its leaders, or claims that the Jews had Christ killed. Holder says
any such anti-Semitic "hate speech" even as "a casual joke made in
private when the speaker thinks no Jewish person is listening," is very,
very bad. It "should scald the conscience of every American." He also
promises that Muslims will be vigorously protected under America's new
hate law, just as they are in Canada, Britain, France and Australia.

Holder concludes with more flattery of ADL: "This organization has a
great tradition of refusing to stand by when others are suffering. You
are guided by your tenets, your precepts, and your values to come to the
aid of others who need help. And so, this evening, I humbly call upon
you to join me and this new administration in reaching out to all our
American neighbors."

Reach out to American neighbors? If there is one thing the federal hate
law does not do, it is reach out to all Americans, providing equal hate
crimes protection.

The only thing certain about the new federal hate law and charlatans
like Holder and ADL, who helped create it and now enforce it, is that
they will continue to deceive and manipulate all Americans to the
benefit of only one minority: the anti-Christ Jews of ADL/B'nai B'rith
International.

(5) Australian "minority" ethnic groups mobilize to fight changes to
Hate Speech laws

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-30/racial-discrimination-act-changes-could-raise-racial-tensions/5419102

Racial Discrimination Act changes could lead to race riots, Government
warned by ethnic groups

By political correspondent Emma Griffiths

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

April 30, 2014

The Abbott Government is facing fierce and united opposition from
influential ethnic groups over its proposed changes to racial
discrimination laws, with one warning in a formal submission that the
amendments will lead to race riots like those seen in Cronulla in 2005.

Exposure draft legislation of the changes was released by the Government
five weeks ago and submissions are due to close today.

The Government wants to repeal key parts of the Racial Discrimination
Act (RDA), including Section 18c which currently makes it illegal to
publicly "offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate" a person or a group
of people.

But the plan to ditch 18c has been roundly criticised, including by
members of the Government's own backbench.

In their submissions, several groups from the Chinese, Arab, Indigenous,
Greek and Jewish communities have urged the Government to abandon the
proposal.

Peak lobby group, the Federation of Ethnic Communities' Councils of
Australia (FECCA) has warned the Government that the change would leave
Australians with no protection against racial vilification.

Instead of being the welcoming and harmonious multi-cultural society
that we all know Australia can be, the Government is allowing an element
of hate to enter national discourse. Chinese Australian Forum "FECCA is
of the view that the Exposure Draft fails to achieve an appropriate and
reasonable balance between the protection from racial vilification and
the protection of free speech," it says in its submission.

"Furthermore, it provides hardly any restrictions on free speech, while
reducing the racial vilification protections to naught."

The Chinese Australian Forum (CAF) says it is an "immoral" move that
will encourage racism.

"By repealing the racial vilification provisions in the RDA, the
Government will be sending a message to the community that essentially
anything goes in the name of free speech, that the changes to Section
18c will definitely perpetuate racial comments and abuse that will
offend and humiliate," the CAF submission says.

"Instead of being the welcoming and harmonious multicultural society
that we all know Australia can be, the Government is allowing an element
of hate to enter national discourse.

"Any moves in the direction of allowing racially motivated hate language
to enter society's vernacular is not only immoral, it is a step
backwards to the stone ages."

CAF vice president Tony Pang described the Government's approach as
"gung ho" and said: "I can't think of one organisation that supports the
change".

The Australian Hellenic Council NSW, which represents key Greek
community organisations, says "no proper case for change in the law has
been made" and has added to calls to retain the existing law.

Arab council warns of heightened racial tensions

The Arab Council Australia (ACA) is also calling for the Government to
abandon the plan.

"We are horrified that vulnerable people will be further disenfranchised
if the proposed changes were to be adopted," the ACA submission says.

It goes on to warn that the changes could provoke similar scenes of
racial tension and violence as the 2005 Cronulla riots.

We submit that the changes in the RDA could have a knock-on effect and
perpetuate changes in other pieces of legislation and codes of conduct
further downgrading protections afforded to all racial minorities. Arab
Council Australia "ACA submits that without the protections we currently
have in existence this will happen again," it says.

"Further we submit that the changes in the RDA could have a knock-on
effect and perpetuate changes in other pieces of legislation and codes
of conduct further downgrading protections afforded to all racial
minorities."

The Government wants to retain as an offence any action that would
"intimidate another person" and to create a new clause making it illegal
to "vilify another person" on the basis of "race, colour or national or
ethnic origin".

It argues that the new laws would both allow freedom of speech and
strengthen the laws against racial vilification.

But the Sydney-based Executive Council of Australian Jewry says the
proposals are fundamentally flawed, and is also calling for the exposure
draft to be abandoned.

"The contemplated protections are artificially defined and unreasonably
narrow," it says in its submission to the Government.

"The contemplated exceptions are unreasonably wide and readily open to
abuse."

Kirstie Parker from the National Congress of Australia's First Peoples
wants the changes to be scrapped completely.

"It adopts a very broad definition of harm," she said.

"It talks about physical harm and fails to recognise the emotional,
psychological and social harm done by racism has a very real and adverse
effect on particularly the way Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
peoples can participate in society.

"We think it basically provides licence to racists."

Western Sydney MP received 'tens of thousands' of representations

Liberal MP Craig Laundy, who is the first Coalition MP to hold the
western Sydney seat of Reid, says he has received tens of thousands of
representations from his constituents urging him to fight the changes.

"I have been at functions with up to 700 people where I have been asked
from a stage in front of the 700 people to fight, to not let this
happen," he told ABC News Online.

"The representations I've received would amount into the tens of
thousands about this.

"I say 'I'm listening', I say 'I'm your representative; my job is to
take your views to Canberra and fight for them'."

Mr Laundy said that since he made his personal opposition to the changes
public several Cabinet ministers and about 25 Coalition backbenchers
have also contacted him to discuss the issue.

The Parliamentary Secretary for Multicultural Affairs, Senator Concetta
Fierravanti-Wells, has welcomed the feedback.

"I am very pleased that the consultation has resulted in so many people
and organisations making submissions," she told ABC News Online.

"It's really important as a government that we are aware of the
differing views on this issue."

Attorney-General George Brandis has defended the changes by telling
Federal Parliament that people have "a right to be bigots", but he has
also left open the possibility of further amendments by saying he is
"very open to other suggestions".

Section 18C became law in 1995 in response to recommendations from major
inquiries including the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody.

In 2011, conservative media figure Andrew Bolt was found to have
breached the Act over two articles he wrote in 2009 about light-skinned
people who identify as Aboriginal.

A federal court judge found that Mr Bolt's articles would have offended
a reasonable member of the Aboriginal community, that he had not written
them in good faith and that there were factual errors.

At the time, Mr Bolt said it was "a terrible day for free speech in this
country". He has welcomed the Government's proposed changes.

(6) FBI Hate Crimes webpage deletes "resources" links to SPLC & ADL


http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/26/fbi-severs-ties-with-liberal-domestic-terrorism-inspiring-southern-poverty-law-center/

FBI severs ties with liberal, domestic terrorism-inspiring Southern
Poverty Law Center

5:52 PM 03/26/2014

Katie McHugh Associate Editor

See All Articles

The Federal Bureau of Investigations removed links to the Southern
Poverty Law Center from the civil rights division’s web page last week,
breaking ties with the group that inspired a would-be mass shooter with
its “Hate Map.”

The SPLC — and the Anti-Defamation League, an outfit dedicated to
fighting anti-Semitism — are no longer identified on the FBI’s hate
crimes page as partners.

“Upon review, the Civil Rights program only provides links to resources
within the federal government,” an FBI spokesman told The Daily Caller.
“While we appreciate the tremendous support we receive from a variety of
organizations, we have elected not to identify those groups on the civil
rights page.”

But the ADL is furious — the FBI reportedly did not inform the group
they planned to cancel their affiliation.

“We are shocked, surprised and disappointed that this would be done
without any consultation with groups such as ours who have been working
closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on issues of hate
crime. We look forward to having further conversations with them on this
issue,” Abraham H. Foxman, the national director of the ADL, said in a
statement.

The SPLC has a torrid relationship with the domestic terrorism it claims
to condemn.

Back in 2012, 28-year-old Floyd Corkins II used the SPLC’s Hate Map,
which lists groups ranging from the Klu Klux Klan to pro-traditional
marriage nonprofits as “active hate groups,” to locate the Family
Research Council based in Washington, D.C. Armed with one hundred rounds
of ammunition and 15 Chik-Fil-A sandwiches, he planned to “smother in
[the] faces” of his victims. Corkins ended shooting up FRC’s lobby and
wounding a security guard.

He was subdued by the wounded security guard and arrested before he
could claim any lives — and charged with three felonies, committing an
act of terrorism while armed, assault with intent to kill and
transporting a firearm over state lines.

During an FBI interrogation, a blasé Corkins told agents he wanted to
“kill as many people as possible” and move on to another massacre at
another organization on his list, which prosecutors declined to release.
(RELATED: Report: Suspected Family Research Council gunman volunteered
at LGBT center)

“It was, uh — Southern Poverty Law lists, uh, anti-gay groups. I found
them online — did a little research, went to the website, stuff like
that,” Corkins said, according to released FBI footage.

Corkins was later sentenced to 25 years in prison. (RELATED: Floyd
Corkins pleads guilty, and there’s a reason you’ve never heard of him)

The SPLC did not take down their Hate Map or their designation of FRC as
a hate group after Corkins used it to commit terrorism. It’s still
listed as active in D.C. A long online description sneers at FRC’s
“anti-gay crusade,” and, most notably, declines to condemn Corkins with
the same virulence — in fact, it doesn’t condemn Corkins at all, but
merely quotes Corkins’ attorney’s allegation that his client was
mentally ill.

For its part, FRC approves of the FBI’s move to sever ties with the
unrepentant SPLC.

“Any association between the federal government and an entity that is
connected in federal court to domestic terrorism should be a no-brainer;
it just shouldn’t happen,” said FRC’s executive vice president, Lt. Gen.
(Ret.) Jerry Boykin in a statement provided to TheDC. ”Last year the
U.S. Secretary of the Army described the Southern Poverty Law Center’s
hate labeling of Christian groups as ’inaccurate, objectionable, and
otherwise inconsistent with current Army policy.’ We agree. We once
again call on the SPLC to stop demonizing pro-family organizations
simply because we stand for different values.”

The SPLC did not return multiple requests for comment by press time.

(7) ADL was founded to contest the conviction of Atlanta B’nai B’rith
President Leo Frank for Sex Murder of 13-year-old girl

http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/10/adl-100-years-of-hate/

ADL: 100 Years of Hate

Published by Editor on October 20, 2013

by Valdis Bell

TODAY MARKS THE 100th anniversary of the largest and most-well funded
hate and defamation group in the history of mankind: the Anti-Defamation
League, or “ADL.” The organization was originally called the
“Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith” after its parent group, the
Jewish fraternal order B’nai B’rith (meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” or,
literally, “Sons of the Cut” — referring to circumcision).
(ILLUSTRATION: Abraham Foxman, director of the ADL)

The ADL was founded in the immediate aftermath of the conviction of
Atlanta B’nai B’rith President Leo Frank for the strangulation and sex
murder of a 13-year-old factory girl, Mary Phagan. The international
Jewish community did not believe that Frank should have been convicted.
They had mounted a huge press, publicity, legal, and lobbying campaign
to convince officials and the public that a Black man, James Conley, was
the real killer. But the evidence against Frank was so strong — and the
evidence against Conley so thin — that the Southern, all White, and
doubtless philo-Semitic (like most of the Christian South) jury
unanimously convicted Leo Frank and sentenced him to hang. Two months
after Frank’s conviction, on October 20, 1913, the ADL was formed. To
this day, the ADL and its allies promote the fiction that Frank’s
conviction was a result of “anti-Semitism” and use the case a rallying
cry to garner support and funding. (“100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty,”
The American Mercury, 26 April 2013)

The ADL operates as a private intelligence agency, sending spies,
infiltrators, disruptors, and agents provocateurs into the camps — both
Jewish and non-Jewish — of those who disagree with its radically
pro-Israel and Jewish supremacist agenda. Also like an intelligence
agency, it maintains a huge database containing personal information on
politicians, writers, dissidents, activists, publishers, bloggers, and
even unaffiliated private citizens so that — should any of these people
“get out of line,” in the opinion of the ADL — they can be threatened,
“exposed,” blackmailed, and thus silenced with maximum effectiveness.

In 1993, an ADL operative, Roy Bullock, was caught corrupting police
officials and illegally obtaining police files to add to the ADL’s
dossiers on “thought criminals” Left and Right. Despite this, the ADL
audaciously uses its money and influence to “educate” law enforcement
officials through a subsidiary called the “Law Enforcement Agency
Resource Network” (LEARN), which uses persuasive techniques to convince
police authorities that individuals and groups that the ADL dislikes are
dangerous criminals — and that the ADL and its allies are
public-spirited, beneficial groups.

Ironically, considering its name, one of the main techniques used by the
ADL, and for which its massive intelligence archive is most useful, is
public defamation of those who the ADL has declared are its enemies.

The ADL is headquartered in New York City and has 29 offices in major
cities in the United States, one in Israel, and two known offices in
other countries. Abraham Foxman has been “national director” of the
group since 1987. It has an admitted annual U.S. budget of $55 million,
with listed assets in 2011 of $171 million.

The Bullock Case

In 1993, an ADL agent named Roy Bullock, a San Francisco art dealer and
fairly well-known in the homosexual community there, whose specialty was
the infiltration of patriotic, Arab-American, and other organizations on
behalf of the League, was found to have in his possession illegally
obtained and highly private and personal data on his targets — data
which could only have been obtained from police and other confidential
government files; data that was also discovered in the files of the ADL
itself when police raided ADL headquarters in San Francisco and Los
Angeles as result of Bullock’s exposure.

According to the Los Angeles Times of 9th April, 1993, “Police on
Thursday served search warrants on the Anti-Defamation League here and
in Los Angeles, seizing evidence of a nationwide intelligence network
accused of keeping files on more than 950 political groups, newspapers,
and labor unions and as many as 12,000 people.

“Describing the spy operations in great detail, San Francisco
authorities simultaneously released voluminous documents telling how
operatives of the Anti-Defamation League searched through trash and
infiltrated organizations to gather intelligence an Arab-American,
right-wing, and what they called “pinko” organizations….

“…Police allege that the organization maintains undercover operatives to
gather political intelligence in at least seven cities, including Los
Angeles and San Francisco.

“Groups that were the focus of the spy operation span the political
spectrum, including such groups as the Ku Klux Klan, the White Aryan
Resistance, Greenpeace, the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People, the United Farm Workers, and the Jewish Defense League.
Also on the list were Mills College, the board of directors of San
Francisco public television station KQED, and the San Francisco Bay
Guardian newspaper.

“People who were subjects of the spy operation included former
Republican Representative Pete McCloskey, jailed political extremist
Lyndon LaRouche and Los Angeles Times correspondent Scott Kraft, who is
based in South Africa….

“…In addition to allegations of obtaining confidential information from
police, the Anti-Defamation League could face a total of 48 felony
counts for not properly reporting the employment of its chief West Coast
spy, Roy Bullock, according to the affidavit filed to justify the search
warrant.” (“ADL Vows to Cooperate With Spy Investigation,” Los Angeles
Times, 9 April, 1993)

I’ll interrupt the article to inform you that those 48 felony counts
were somehow suppressed and the ADL was never prosecuted. A sweetheart
deal was worked out in 2000 under which the ADL admitted no wrongdoing,
paid an out-of-court settlement — of under $200,000 — part of it for
legal fees and the rest to “charitable groups” which “fight hate” (in
other words, the kind of groups the ADL would support anyway — one such
group was the “Hate Crimes Reward Fund”), issued a weak apology for
dealing with “fact finders” who had violated the law, supposedly without
the knowledge of the ADL, and then had the unbelievable audacity to
reaffirm their “right” to spy on any group and anyone just as they
always have!

Continuing:

“The Anti-Defamation League disguised payments to Bullock for more than
25 years by funneling $550 a week to Beverly Hills attorney Bruce I.
Hochman, who then paid Bullock, according to the documents released in
San Francisco. Hochman, a former president of the Jewish Federation
Council of Greater Los Angeles and one of the state’s leading tax
attorneys, will be out of the city until late next week and could not be
reached for comment, his office said.

“Until 1990, Hochman, a former U.S. prosecutor, also was a member of a
panel appointed by then-Senator Pete Wilson to secretly make initial
recommendations on new federal judges in California. Hochman is a former
regional president of the Anti-Defamation League….

“David Lehrer, executive director of the Los Angeles ADL office, said
the organization has not violated the law….

“…But in an affidavit filed to obtain warrants for Thursday’s searches,
San Francisco police allege that ‘ADL employees were apparently less
than truthful’ in providing information in an earlier search conducted
without a warrant….

“…The police affidavit contends that Lehrer had sole control of a secret
fund used to pay for ‘fact-finding operations.’ Lehrer, according to the
documents, signed checks from the account under the name ‘L. Patterson.’…

“…League officials will not confirm or deny whether Bullock was an
employee and have said they simply traded information with police
departments about people who might be involved in hate crimes.”

I’ll add here that the category of crime called “hate crimes” was
virtually invented by the ADL. The purpose of such laws is to add extra
penalties for acts which are already crimes under existing statutes —
like murder, assault, etc. — if the perpetrator can be shown to have
held prejudiced or “hateful” views which might have motivated his
actions. Under “hate crime” laws, American citizens would receive
different sentences for the same crime, depending on whether or not
their thoughts are “Politically Correct” on issues relating to
homosexuality, race, nationality, and politics. That such laws might
have a chilling effect on free speech — for a thoughtful person would
now realize that his every utterance on “sensitive” topics might someday
be used against him in a court of law, should he be required to defend
himself with force someday or even have an argument with a member of a
“protected class” — was probably the ADL’s intention all along. [...]

References
“100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty,” The American Mercury, 26 April 2013
“ADL Vows to Cooperate With Spy Investigation,” Los Angeles Times, 9
April, 1993
“New Details of Extensive ADL Spy Operation Emerge,” Los Angeles Times,
13 April, 1993
“Police Seize Documents from Jewish Group,” Mark Mooney, New York Daily
News, 9 April, 1993
“Is the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith Spying on You?”, Bill
Hughes, Baltimore Sentinel, September 1993
“Los Angeles Court Hands Down Final Judgment in Anti-Defamation League
Illegal Surveillance Case,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,
December 1999
Square One, Arnold Forster. New York: Donald I. Fine, 1988
“ADL Campaign Against Tolerance,” William Norman Grigg, New American,
September 19, 1994
The Watchdogs, Laird Wilcox, Editorial Research Service, Olathe, Kansas,
1998
“The Jewish Thought Police,” Robert I. Friedman, Village Voice, July 27,
1993
“Glamorous Purim Formula,” Rabbi Leon Spitz, The American Hebrew, March
1, 1946

Resources
Annual Report of the ADL
“Defamation”: A Jewish filmmaker’s interesting study of “anti-Semitism”
and the ADL (video, 90 minutes)


(8) Sweden's war on Hate Speech

http://www.spiked-online.com/freespeechnow/fsn_article/sweden-is-no-haven-liberty

Sweden is no haven of liberty

Even this supposedly liberal paradise has laws against saying offensive
things.

by Sadhvi Sharma

2 April 2014

Sweden is typically depicted as a liberal paradise, an evolved and
open-minded society where tolerance and equality define public life. No
one believes this more, it seems, than the Swedish authorities. The
official website for Sweden even makes the proud claim that 'openness
shapes Swedish society'. This image of Sweden as tolerant and liberal
suggests it is a nation that take freedoms seriously, which appreciates
the importance of liberty. This is certainly what I was led to believe
when I moved here six months ago.

But take a closer look at Swedish society and a different picture
emerges. It is an image of a nation in which freedom of speech comes
with numerous caveats, a society in which the reprimand 'you can't say
that' is on the edge of every conversation. Freedom of speech is all
well and good, it seems, so long as it conforms to the expectations of
polite society.

Sweden's war on hate speech

According to Sweden's constitution, every person has the right to
communicate and express thoughts, opinions and feelings in speech,
writing, imagery or otherwise. Equally, people also have the right to
'receive any information or utterances'. The right to express and
receive thoughts, opinions and feelings is an important right. And it is
also important that it has been enshrined in Sweden's constitution.

But, at the same time, it is a right that is being neutralised by
Sweden's hate and defamation laws.

The key piece of hate-speech legislation in Sweden is the 'hets mot
folksgrupp' law, which proscribes 'agitation against a national or
ethnic group'. First created in 1948, it was presented as a response to
the anti-Semitic propaganda of the 1930s and 1940s. (The first person to
be convicted under the law was Einar Åberg, a well-known anti-Semite
regarded by some as the reason the law was introduced in the first place.)

This is not to suggest the het mots folksgrupp law was the beginning of
free-speech blunting legislation. Sweden has long had a law against
'objectionable or offensive behaviour' ( 'förargelseväckande beteende').
This law, which still exists today, was applied to anti-Semitic
propagandists before the hets mot folksgrupp. In 1935, for example, the
propaganda chief of the National Socialists' student party was convicted
under the förargelseväckande beteende for printing offensive posters and
stickers, featuring the slogan 'Jew, do not leave your house on Friday',
and posting them on Jewish shops.

Still, since 1948, the hets mot folksgrupp has become ever-more
prominent as it has expanded in scope. In 1988, for instance, it became
an offence to agitate against not just national or ethnic groups but
also racial groups or people of colour. Hence today, hate speech in
Sweden is defined as speech that publicly and intentionally threatens or
expresses disrespect or contempt for ethnic or other such groups by
alluding to race, colour, national origin, ethnic origin, creed or
sexual orientation.

While the hets mots folksgrupp might not be a new law, its everyday
impact and application has certainly increased since 1948. The irony is
that its expansion has gone hand-in-hand with Sweden's promotion of
itself as an open, liberal society.

It is true that not many have been convicted under the hets mots
folksgrupp, but that does not diminish its chilling effect on free
speech. In 1980, for instance, a person at the entrance of a campsite
put up a sign which read: 'Gypsies not allowed to enter campsite.' The
authorities considered this to be hate speech and the sign was later
taken down. In another, more recent case, two youths on a bus directed
racist remarks towards three fellow passengers: two 'dark-skinned'
individuals and one Indian person (who did not even understand Swedish).
The defendants got off on a technicality: if other passengers on the bus
had not heard them, what they said could not be categorised as remarks
made 'publicly'.

Hate-speech laws, wherever they exist, are invariably justified in the
name of protecting people. But what this means is that the state begins
regulating peoples' everyday verbal interactions. Hate-speech
legislation is not designed to protect people from actual physical
attack, but rather from disparaging comments, from words and opinions
that may be deemed 'disrespectful'. It is not just speech deemed
potentially 'dangerous' that is restricted, but also speech considered
offensive to polite society.

In 2003, the hets mots folksgrupp law was revised to include homosexuals
as a protected group. As a result, seven individuals were dragged to
court in 2005 for distributing flyers on a school campus that described
homosexuals as promiscuous, the cause of HIV and AIDS, and spreaders of
paedophilia. According to the prosecutor, 'through their actions' the
defendants had 'expressed contempt for a group of persons'.

This desire to expand the scope of the hets mots folksgrupp, so as to
treat an ever-increasing number of groups as vulnerable, and in need of
protection, is seen by many as progressive. But look a little closer,
and the progressive sheen dulls. What this legal assault on unpleasant
or rude speech does is to treat Swedish citizens like fragile items, to
be kept safe from rude or insulting speech in the legal equivalent of
bubble-wrap. The Swedish state is effectively sanitising and restraining
society.

I experienced this firsthand when attending a debate on freedom of
speech in the university town of Uppsala. The panellists - a stand-up
comedian, a journalist and a human-rights activist - were incapable of
disagreeing with one another. And the audience was incapable of
challenging them on anything. Everybody agreed that freedom of speech
was important, with many keen to point out how 'people died for freedom
of speech'. And everybody was proud of Sweden's liberal credentials
compared with Iran, North Korea or Russia, where 'people didn't know
what freedom of speech was'.

Yet the most striking point of consensus was that freedom of speech was
not and could not be absolute. There are always exceptions, always
caveats, the speakers all agreed. This point was not even up for
discussion; it was just a shared assumption. One had to be
'responsible', 'balance' was necessary, and 'respect' vital. That even a
comic or a journalist would take it for granted that there should be
limits to speech shows how deeply entrenched is the wariness towards
this freedom today. 'You can't say that'

On an anecdotal level, I have found that alongside the legal
proscription of hate speech, there is also a set of informal rules about
what you can and can't say - the 'you can't say that' moments of Swedish
liberal social and cultural life.

You don't have to be a racist or a homophobe to be shunned; you just
have to voice the 'wrong' kind of opinions. For instance, you cannot be
opposed to gay marriage, or express support for the Swedish Democrats (a
far-right party equivalent to the British National Party, but with
actual representatives in parliament), without being virtually
excommunicated. And if you dare express scepticism about climate change,
be prepared for social wrath. Your decency and your moral standing are
judged by whether you hold the 'correct' views on feminism, on
homosexuality, on race, on the environment, on the Israel-Palestine
conflict. 'Incorrect' positions will see you cast out.

The legal impulse to shut down hateful, offensive or 'dangerous' speech,
ideas or thoughts, so prevalent in Sweden, and the social impulse to
shut out unpopular opinions, are both signs of intolerance - a socially
acceptable unwillingness to engage with opinions that might grate,
offend, shock, or simply be different from one's own. To think that a
society where individuals tip-toe around each other, avoiding a head-on
clash of ideas, is somehow a more liberal and open society is to
subscribe to the propaganda of Sweden's official website. Lurking
beneath the liberal self-image, there are very strong currents of
intolerance and conformism.

Sadhvi Sharma is a PhD student in the Rajaratnam School of International
Studies (RSIS) at the Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.

(9) Sweden has become a totalitarian state. "Progressives" rule; only
minorities are recognized

http://www.deliberation.info/nordisk-ungdom-ukraine/

Nordisk Ungdom in Ukraine

by Lasse Wilhelmson

February 26, 2014

Introduction by Lasse Wilhelmson: This guy is from a nationalist quite
small group of young people mostly from Sweden but also Nordic. Not
really a party or traditional organization. Anyone can join for free.
They produce short videos and perform in the streets with excellent
satire and humor – no violence or hate. I think they have a humanistic
approach in everything they do, and they think all people are equal and
have a right to their countries and cultures – even Swedes. Of course
they are against mass immigration like myself, and are labeled as
“racists” by main stream media. They call themselves political artists,
and go to Ukraine to warn the people there for the Swedish model :) And
I assure you, what he says about Sweden is correct. I just can not help
loving them.

Source

Speech held by Fredrik Hagberg, international contact person in Nordisk
Ungdom, to Ukrainian revolutionaries in Kiev earlier this evening:

”Brothers!

I stand before your forces of revolution to tell you about what your
future might be if you fail your glorious endeavour.

I stand here as a Swede. However where I come from is no longer Sweden.
My country has been transformed into an international territory; ruled
by a totalitarian state which forces experimental progressive agendas on
its inhabitants. Let me explain:

In Sweden, you no longer need a citizenship to educate yourself in the
Swedish school system. Every human being on Earth has a right to go to
school in Sweden – for free. Only Swedes themselves have to pay for it.

In Sweden, you no longer need a citizenship to enjoy free healthcare.
Every human being on Earth has a right to free healthcare in Sweden.
Only Swedes themselves have to pay for it.

If you have a Swedish passport, you pay for your dental health care. If
you don’t have a Swedish passport: it is free.

The Swedish people is not defined in or protected by Swedish law. Only
minorities are recognized on a collective scale. The Swedish people have
no rights in its own state. In fact, Swedish law only recognises the
Sami people as the true indigenous in Sweden. By law it is not my
country anymore!

The government, the politicians and the officials of the state has
distanced themselves from the people and formed a new political class,
similar to that of the Soviet union – where they rob the country and use
our common resources to enrich themselves.

The apparatchiks of the state has formed a mutual alliance with the
monopoly-based mass media, to enforce their agenda, control the debate
and persecute every form of opposition.

The Swedish media in their turn officially co-operates with the violent
communist and anarchist groups to identify and terrorise every opposition.

When the radical left and immigrant groups riot, burn cars in the
streets and throw molotows at police and ambulance personnel – they get
government funding and a political career.

When a dissident post an anonymous critical comment on the internet –
his name and picture end up in the newspaper.

The state enforces their experimental progressive agenda by starting
early to shape it inhabitants. Today – as a part of the governmentally
regulated school plan – a chief function of the public schools is to
erase gender identity. They do this by forcing boys to play with dolls,
and girls to play with cars and guns. Even calling a boy “boy” and a
girl “girl” is viewed as obsolete.

The state wants every schoolfunction to refer to every person with the
made up and so called “gender neutral” word “hen”. Hen is made up by the
radical feminist think tanks that are an influential part of the Swedish
establishment. The use is similar to the praxis “citoienne” in
revolutionary France, or “comrade” in the communist states.

As a part of the progressive agenda, Swedish State Television shows
information programs for the Swedish youth – 13 to 16 – on how to have
sex with immigrants and disabled. These shows is also shown in school as
a mandatory part of education.

The progressive agenda is also evident in the states destruction of the
normal, heterosexual family. Some politicians propose mandatory day care
for two year olds.

There is also propositions on dividing parental leave, forcing dads to
stay home and women to work – or leaving the kids in the care of the state.

No wonder we have 40 000 abortions every year. That is almost 0.5%
percent of our total population. We kill our babies and import tens of
thousands of immigrants instead.

Officials in Sweden likes to calls us the most modern country in the world.

I say to you, brothers, this is what awaits you if you choose to follow
our example.

You now have the opportunity to choose and create your own future. DO
not accept the trap of choosing either the West or Russia.

Europe needs free and sovereign nations, ready to unite in face of
threat and danger, working together to strengthen our continent – not to
work in the interests of the West or the East.

Choose your own freedom.

Choose our common European freedom.

Thank you.”

About Lasse Wilhelmson

Lasse Wilhelmson was born in 1941 in Stockholm, Sweden and has been
retired since 2005. He is married to Lena, who is a Reader in Education,
and has a large family with five children and a growing number of
grandkids. Lasse’s professional life has been dominated by pedagogical
questions in different contexts, starting out as a researcher and
teacher at the university and ending as a wood-work instructor at a
suburban school in Stockholm. He has a long experience of idealistic
anti-imperialist solidarity work, from Vietnam until today. And he has
as well been a union representative. Lasse has further worked on
voluntary basis as an elected representative in his local council for 23
years, representing a coalition cutting across party lines. He was
active in the revolutionary movement of 1968, and later within a Jewish
peace group. Today Lasse is neither a Marxist nor a Jew and sees himself
as a politically and ideologically independent humanist who regards the
fight for Palestinian rights as the key to a peaceful world and Zionism
as the biggest threat to humanity today.

(10) Football Association gets its anti-racist knickers in a twist over
Quenelle

http://www.deliberation.info/football-association-gets-anti-racist-knickers-twist-quenelle/

by Stuart Littlewood

March 3, 2014

West Bromwich Albion’s star player Nicolas Anelka recently landed
himself and his club in hot water when he allegedly performed the
Quenelle after scoring a goal. It blew up into a furious storm in a
Zionist teacup.

The Quenelle is a gesture made notorious by the French comic Dieudonné
M’bala M’bala. It involves touching or gripping your shoulder with one
hand while holding the palm of your other hand outstretched and pointing
to the ground – a kind of suppressed Nazi salute. Dieudonné’s fans say
it’s simply a gesture of defiance, an anti-establishment ‘up yours’, but
it has been branded anti-Semitic with knobs on by the gesture police so
Anelka was promptly charged by the Football Association with making an
“abusive” gesture.

Anelka insisted that the Quenelle was harmless anti-establishment stuff
in support of his friend Dieudonné. Unfortunately the comedian, who is
said to have created the salute, has been prosecuted in France for
anti-Semitism.

Actually the Quenelle first came to my notice back in 1964 in the film
‘Dr Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb‘,
in which Peter Sellers plays a demented former Nazi scientist who
repeatedly performs the same strangulated Nazi salute from a wheelchair.
How a piss-take of the Nazis could, 50 years later, be interpreted as an
anti-Semitic crime is, I confess, beyond me.

Will screenings of Dr Strangelove henceforth be banned?

The point about Strangelove’s salute is that his arm is uncontrollable
and the hand wears a menacing black leather glove. Perhaps Anelka’s
defence counsel should have pleaded AHS – better known as Strangelove’s
“alien hand syndrome”.

Matters have now run their predictable course and Anelka has been banned
for five matches by the FA and fined £80,000. And West Brom have
suspended him. But the more thrusting Ziofreaks don’t think this is enough.

The FA’s three-man Independent Regulatory Commission, chaired by a QC,
found that…

In or around the 40th minute of the match he made a gesture (known as
the ‘quenelle’) which was abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting
and/or improper, contrary to FA Rule E3(1); and….

That the misconduct was an “Aggravated Breach” as defined by FA Rule
E3(2) in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race
and/or religion or belief…. We did not find that Nicolas Anelka is an
Anti-Semite or that he intended to express or promote Anti-Semitism by
his use of the quenelle.

He must, however, submit to a compulsory education programme. This is
reminiscent of the sinister re-education inflicted on Liberal Democrat
MP David Ward last year after he annoyed prickly Holocaust bosses with
alleged misuse of “language” rather than arm movements.

Simon Johnson, Interim Chief Executive of the Jewish Leadership Council,
said of the verdict:

“The FA was sent pictures of the gesture being made at such ‘pillars of
the establishment’ as the Auschwitz concentration camp, the Berlin
Holocaust memorial, the Anne Frank House…. With the accepted definition
of anti-Semitism, it does not matter whether Anelka, or even officials
within The FA’s disciplinary department, think that a gesture is
anti-Semitic or not. Whether something is anti- Semitic depends on the
perception of the victims of the insult or abuse. It is therefore robust
practice in anti-Racism to seek the views of the group likely to be
offended.”

Palestinians – Muslim and Christian — living in humiliation under
Israel’s apartheid jackboot, take note of this “robust practice”.

And speaking to BBC News the vice-president of the Board of Deputies of
British Jews, Jonathan Arkush, explained that the Quenelle was
‘anti-system’ in the sense that Dieudonné calls the French Zionist lobby
that has taken the government prisoner ‘the system’. “So you know
exactly what he’s getting at. We don’t see the gesture as benign at all…
Making a gesture that has racist connotations is a very serious matter,
even if it wasn’t meant to be.”

Watch the video of that fateful moment linked here (2 minutes in). Most
people wouldn’t notice it had happened. Or, if they did, they’d suppose
Anelka was simply nursing a bruise to his upper right arm. It certainly
wasn’t a dramatic or triumphant gesture and only paranoid ‘twitchers’
would have spotted it.

The FA, after all the fuss, now judges that Anelka’s use of the Quenelle
wasn’t anti-Semitic at all. Confused? They seems to be. Are we to
deduce, then, that the gesture wasn’t racist and the Quenelle isn’t
either? So was the incident really a flogging offence? Why the fine? Why
the ban? Why the need to brainwash this sporting hero? The words
“knickers” and “twisted” spring to mind.

Consider the sickening context….

‘Contrary to sporting values’

The FA bristles with indignation at any hint of racism in the game and
has armed itself with elaborate rules to deal with it, as Anelka
discovered. Yet this governing body has been remarkably quiet about
apartheid Israel’s inclusion in the European under-21 championship and
hosting of the finals last year in Tel Aviv. The racist regime is not
even part of Europe. It cruelly obstructs Palestinians, whose territory
it illegally occupies, in all sport, preventing travel to international
fixtures, blocking movement between Gaza and the West Bank and making
training a national team impossible. It even murders Palestinian
footballers or imprisons them without trial.

It was left to European footballers themselves to sign a statement
condemning in particular Israel’s assault on Gaza. It also read:

We are informed that on 10 November 2012 the Israeli army bombed a
sports stadium in Gaza, resulting in the death of four young people
playing football…. We are also informed that since February 2012 two
footballers with the club al-Amari…. have been detained in Israel
without charge or trial.

It is unacceptable that children are killed while they play football.
Israel hosting the UEFA under-21 European championship, in these
circumstances, will be seen as a reward for actions that are contrary to
sporting values.

Electronic Intifada reported that in a letter to the president of the
European soccer governing body UEFA, dozens of Palestinian football
clubs, managers, players and other Palestinian sporting figures based in
Gaza urged UEFA not to “reward Israel for its violent repression of
Palestinian rights.”

And in October of that year, Palestinian footballer and ex-prisoner
Mahmoud Sarsak urged UEFA to withdraw from Israel the men’s under-21
European Championship and the women’s under-19 European Championship due
to take place there in 2013 and 2015 respectively.

“Israel works endlessly to repress Palestinian football, just like it
does many other forms of Palestinian culture,” Sarsak wrote, adding,
“Israel does not behave like a normal state where citizens can play
sport freely. Why then, should it be granted the honour of hosting the
UEFA U21s championship in 2013, or the women’s U19s in 2015?”

Furthermore, between 14 and 22 November 2012 the headquarters of
Palestine’s National Paralympic Committee and other sports
infrastructure were destroyed by Israel’s 8-day bombardment.

On 21 November, the official website of the International Paralympic
Committee reported:

“On Monday morning, the office of the Palestinian Paralympic Committee
in Gaza was exposed to heavy shelling that destroyed the building and
infrastructure of the nation’s Paralympic headquarters. The Palestine
Stadium and accessible Palestine Sports building were fully destructed.
The sports facilities were both used by athletes who trained for the
London 2012 Paralympic Games and athletes with an impairment who live
close to the Gaza strip.”

The Jewish state bombed Gaza’s stadium before, in 2006, rendering it
unusable. Football’s international governing body FIFA helped rebuild
it. So the FA in England needs to get things in perspective, keep in
mind Israel’s monstrous acts and condemn them as vigorously as other
racist abuse, if not more so.

A BDS role for AHS ?

France isn’t the only country where the Zionist lobby has taken the
government prisoner. As a result of the pumped-up Anelka incident, and
the objectionable way it was handled, it would be no surprise to find
people of conscience all over the world suddenly and mysteriously
afflicted with AHS.

As the Quenelle farce played out I was reading Veterans Today editor Dr
Kevin Barrett’s hilarious rant against his being omitted from the Top
Ten Anti-Semites List while his editorial colleague Gordon Duff won a
coveted place on it.

Barrett asks despairingly what else he has to do to make the list.

I am…. perfectly willing to express even more disgust for Israel than I
already have. If there are any uncomplimentary adjectives I have not yet
hurled in the general direction of the Zionist entity, just let me know
and I will hurl them forthwith.

Honestly, I will do almost ANYTHING to get on your list…. You name it,
I’ll do it.”

Well, Kevin, a sure way to get noticed is to kick a ball around outside
Abe Foxman’s office while performing the Quenelle, aka Alien Hand
Syndrome. For good measure, next time you’re in London do the same
outside the Board of Deputies and the JLC.

(11) Dieudonée and the Global Jewish Assault on Free Speech

http://www.deliberation.info/dieudonee-global-jewish-assault-free-speech/

by Ariadna Theokopoulos on February 7, 2014

[...] Nicolas Anelka and The Quenelle: Jewish Hysteria Reaches A Fever Pitch

On December 28th, 2013, the legendary international football star and
current West Bromwich Albion striker Nicolas Anelka, who won the World
Cup with France in 2006 and has played with top clubs across Europe for
almost two decades, set off a chain of events that he could not have
possibly imagined would ever come to fruition. After scoring his first
of two goals during that Saturday match, Anelka performed the
"quenelle", an anti-establishment gesture popularized by Dieudonné which
essentially means "up yours". Alarm bells began ringing across
Jewish-Zionist power centers across the globe and before the grueling
match which ended in a 3-3 draw was even in the books, Anelka was being
deemed an "anti-Semite" in the international press. West Bromwich Albion
coach Keith Downing blasted the accusations as "absolute rubbish" (1).

Utter ridiculousness aside, an investigation was immediately initiated
by the FA (Football Association), and after a little more than 3 weeks,
Anelka was charged with "making a gesture that was abusive and/or
indecent and/or insulting and/or improper", as well as "an aggravated
breach in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race
and/or religion or belief". He was punished with a 5-match ban (2).
Additionally, Zoopla, a British property website owned by Jewish
businessman Alex Chesterman and a main sponsor of West Bromwich Albion,
cut its sponsorship of the club because it wouldn’t drop Anelka (3).
Chesterman’s pressure is only the tip of the iceberg however, as the
entire campaign against Nicolas Anelka was driven by the organized
Jewish community, notably the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the
Community Security Trust (4), a dangerous organization with connections
to the international Zionist terrorist organization known as the Mossad (5).

{photo} David Bernstein: the Jewish supremacist high roller that is
"zionizing" British football {end}

It is by no means coincidental but rather part and parcel of the horror
that has been inflicted upon Nicolas Anelka that the chairman of the FA
is David Bernstein, a devout Jew who has repugnantly used his position
to spread "Holocaust" propaganda wrapped in the garb of football to the
UK’s youth (6), and an ardent Zionist who gleefully turned the "Football
For All" platform into a whitewashing festival of the usurping "Israeli"
regime’s genocidal existence (7). Equally critical to note is the fact
that while are very few Jewish players in British football, Jews run the
vast majority of the Premier League. Among these owners is Roman
Abramovich (8), an obscenely wealthy Zionist gangster involved in
"Israeli" blood diamond dealing and the ethnic cleansing of occupied
Al-Quds (9). Point being? Nicolas Anelka adamantly denying that he is
racist or "anti-Semitic" (10) is ultimately irrelevant due to the
undeniable truth that the Jewish persons controlling British football
have a Zionist agenda that is global in scope.

To add further insult to injury, Nicolas Anelka endured another dose of
heavy embarrassment after Roger Cukierman, the president of CRIF
(Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France), initially
stated that Anelka’s performing of the quenelle in that particular
context was not "anti-Semitic" but then backtracked once it was clear
that the football star would be charged, going as far to say that the
usage of the quenelle was being "dangerously spread among our citizens
and especially youth." Zionist fanatic Cukierman continued on in a rabid
tirade against Dieudonné (11), proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that
"free speech", "democratic ideals" and the truth above all else are of
no concern to Jewish supremacists when their agenda is hanging on by a
thread; all of those attributes aren’t merely denied but trampled upon
with malice.

{photo} Dieudonné’s quenelle, feared by Zionists everywhere; embraced by
the oppressed everywhere else:

Onslaught On Dieudonné: World Zionism Mobilizes To Muzzle Him

Verily, Nicolas Anelka and his career are just collateral damage in this
ongoing debacle. As the author of a recent venomous, hysterical
editorial in the staunchly Zionist Jewish Daily Forward opined, "it is
Dieudonné who is the true villain in this saga." The piece, titled
"‘Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle’", goes on to take jabs at
Anelka, label the quenelle as "neo-fascist" and viciously attack Dieudo
for the "crime" of bringing Jewish-Zionist power to light and not making
any bones about it in the process (12). And this is only the tip of the
anti-Dieudonné iceberg. In the wake of the madness sparked by Anelka’s
quenelle, an avalanche of hasbara was generated by Organized Jewry
against the comedic phenom.

To name a minute few: The "Israeli" daily Ynet insanely labeled Dieudo a
"modern day brown shirt" and lambasted the quenelle as a symbol of
"modern day violent anti-Semitism" (13); the Jewish Daily Forward, in
one of many attacks, notes that "the real danger is that Dieudonné is
also pulling down the government’s shorts (14)." It isn’t the French
regime that the Forward is worried about though, but the
"Israeli"-blue-and-white-drenched hands behind it; Haaretz assailed
Dieudonné for having "malignant influence (15)"; the Algemeiner
gleefully carried the statements of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
which repeatedly condemned Dieudo (16), and along with the European
Jewish Congress (EJC) and the umbrella group of Belgian Jewish
organizations, CCOJB, played a key role in pressuring the French regime
into cracking down on the French-Cameroonian star (17). Tablet Magazine,
a most obnoxious Zionist rag owned by a brat of the immensely wealthy
and powerful Newhouse family, published several hit pieces but one in
particular glaringly stood out as it admitted that the quenelle is "hard
to explain and harder to resist (18)", thus exposing the intellectual
bankruptcy of International Jewry and its agents.

Leading the campaign against Dieudonné have been the aforementioned
CRIF, France’s AIPAC, and LICRA (The International League Against Racism
and Anti-Semitism), the French version of the ADL. LICRA, which has been
agitating against him for over a decade now since he first criticized
Zionism, has special privileges under French law, and, in blatantly
similar fashion to a powerful mafia, has been using one nonsensical
pretext after another to justify lawsuits that would lead to his
blacklisting (19).

{photo} Roger Cukierman: Head of the CRIF (the French AIPAC), and
leading Zionist operator against Dieudonné:

The CRIF-LICRA campaign paid dividends as the mayors of Marseille,
Tours, and Bordeaux banned Dieudonné from performing in their cities on
January 7th, 2014 (20). Two days later on January 9th, 2014, a French
court threw out the bans, much to the delight of Dieudonné and his fans.
Unfortunately, victory was declared too soon however as CRIF revved up
the pressure (21), and with Zionist lapdogs President Hollande and
Interior Minister Valls leading the charge, the overturn of the bans was
unprecedentedly flipped at the last minute by Conseil d’Etat, France’s
highest court, just before a Dieudonné show in Nantes (22), hence
removing him from as many public forums as possible under the banner of
"anti-racism", arguably the most legendary and deceptive mask of Zion in
existence today.

Worse still, one of the hit pieces that targeted the anti-Zionist comic,
penned by an IOF commander and fanatical settler for Zionist colony
mouthpiece Arutz Sheva, blatantly attempted to link Dieudonné and his
quenelle to the March 2012 attack on a Jewish school in Toulouse (23),
which, ironically or maybe even deliberately enough, bore all the
likenesses of a false flag attack (24).

It is of no coincidence that following this disgraceful accusation,
along with the continuing siege led by the Jewish-Zionist Lobby in
France, Dieudo was targeted by les Huissiers de Justice, the collection
arm of the French Justice Ministry, which showed up at his door
demanding that he pay some 100,000 euros that he allegedly owed for
several thought crime convictions he had amassed through the years. A
verbal altercation ensued between Dieudo and the bailiffs, and then
shots were fired. Dieudo was called in for questioning the following day
and a warrant was subsequently issued to comb his home. A "projectile
device", whatever that is, was discovered in the search. Extraordinarily
dubious does not do justice to the description of this event, and this
is confirmed by the bailiffs themselves who don’t know who fired at them
(25).

Taking the supreme questionableness of this happening into
consideration, and then coupling it with the genocidal Zionist entity
being responsible for the horrors of 9/11 (26), the calamity of 7/7 (27)
and the catastrophe of 26/11 (28), as well as the fact that there are
numerous occurrences of Jews faking "anti-Semitic" crimes (29), it is
not beyond the limits of Organized Jewry and its acolytes by any means
to stage such an event to put the proverbial nail in Dieudo’s coffin.

When Dieudonné is on stage, International Jewry begins to shake in its
very bones.

Nevertheless, Dieudonné, a dedicated anti-Zionist and a man of faith who
identifies himself as an "Islamic Christian", has stood his ground and
refused to go quietly into the night as his "chosenite" tormenters
bombard him from every angle. He has decided to do what he has done
since awakening to the evils of Zionism so many years ago (30): fight
back. His supporters, in an operation they wittily titled "Triple
Quenelle", hacked three French pro-"Israel" websites, including the
French Jewish Defense League, and replaced the hateful Zionist content
with Dieudonné support messages (31); Dieudo himself confronted the
allegations against Nicolas Anelka, rejecting the accusations of
"racism" and "anti-Semitism" and calling the football legend his
"brother in humanity", "noble", "hope" and "a prince (32)"; and in the
best response of all, Dieudo returned to the stage in defiance of the
Zionist-run French establishment, smashing a howling crowd of more than
5,000 in Bordeaux (33).

What makes this latest show so uniquely significant is that the crowd
was not comprised of the usual downtrodden Black and Brown (especially
Muslim) youth which have been Dieudo’s most loyal fans through the
years, but White and working class (33). This terrifies the French
establishment and its Zionist overlords. In their minds, the thought
that not only the peoples of the lands they once colonized but their own
European citizenry could become part of the masses supporting Dieudo is
a dangerous development indeed. Not to be outflanked, Paris responded by
intensifying its measures against the humorist, launching raids on his
home, production company and other premises (34). Resistant still,
Dieudonné fired back yet again by declaring that he will go to the UK to
prove he is anything but "racist’, as well as to display his solidarity
with Nicolas Anelka, but these plans aren’t happening either, as the UK
regime has banned him from entering after declaring him "persona non
grata (35)." Considering the Jewish origins of Prime Minister David
Cameron himself, as well as the powerful Jewish-Zionist moneymen who
secured his rise to power (35a), it isn’t even the tiniest bit
surprising that this Orwellian action was taken. [...]

Sources:
(1) Downing Denies Anelka Anti-Semitism by ESPN
(2) Nicolas Anelka: FA Charges West Brom Striker Over Gesture by BBC
(3) Zoopla To End West Brom Sponsorship Over Nicolas Anelka’s Quenelle
Gesture by Sky Sports
(4) Jewish Community Urges FA To "Follow Through" On Anelka by Jewish News
(5) EI Exclusive: UK Charity With Mossad Links Secretly Denounced
Anti-Zionist Jews To Government by Asa Winstanely, The Electronic Intifada
(6) David Bernstein: It’s Been A Game Of Two Halves by Simon Round, The
Jewish Chronicle
(7) Israel And The UK Celebrate "Football For All" by Israeli Embassy London
(8) The Life And Rise Of Jews In Our Game by Patrick Barclay, London
Evening Standard
(9) What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz And The Russian Mob Have In
Common? by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam
(10) Nicolas Anelka faces Lengthy Ban After Controversial Quenelle
Gesture by Sachin Nakrani, The Guardian
(11) Nicolas Anelka Receives Blow To Defence of Quenelle Salute by The
Guardian
(12) ‘Zoopla’ Joins Gibberish Feud Over ‘Quenelle’ by Eddy Portnoy, The
Jewish Daily Forward
(13) France’s Potential Breakdown by Riccardo Dugulin, Ynet
(14) How ‘Quenelle’ Salute Creator Dieudonne Built Bridge To
Anti-Semitic Far Fight by Robert Zaretsky, The Jewish Daily Forward
(15) The Soccer Star Who’s Putting The Cool Back In Anti-Semitism by
Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz
(16) ADL Praises France For Crackdown On Anti-Semitic Comic Dieudonné by
The Algemeiner
(17) Jewish Groups Praise French Government’s Commitment To Combat
Anti-Semitism by The European Jewish Press
(18) Despicable Meme: Why The Quenelle Is the Grumpy Cat Of Anti-Semites
by Liel Leibovitz, Tablet Magazine
(19) The Bête Noire Of The French Establishment by Diana Johnstone,
Counter Punch
(20) French Cities Ban Comedian Dieudonné Over Nazi-Style ‘Quenelle’
Salute by The Algemeiner
(21) "Quenelle" Comic Dieudonne Wins Court Battle On Ban Over "Nazi"
Gesture by The Jewish Daily Forward
(22) French Court Upholds Ban on ‘Quenelle’ Comic Dieudonné’s Shows by
The Jewish Daily Forward
(23) Op-Ed: The Significance Of The Quenelle Gesture by Ron Jager, Arutz
Sheva
(24) French Terror Attack: All The Hallmarks Of An Intelligence Psy-Op
And False Flag by Kurt Nimmo, Empire Strikes Black
(25) Anti-Semitic Comedian Dieudonné In Hot Water With French
Authorities by Vladislav Davidzon, Tablet Magainze
(26) The 9/11 Delusion: Israel’s False Flag, Jingoism And Inhumanity by
Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(27) 7/7: The Terror Drill, The Military Explosives And The Israeli
Connection by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black
(28) 26/11: Mossad Terrorizes Mumbai by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(29) Jewish People Caught Framing Gentiles For "Anti-Semitic" Hate
Crimes by Gilad Atzmon, Deliberation
(30) Israel Lobby Commits Major Blunder In France: Tries To Silence A
Comedian And Dieudonné Strikes Back! by Radio Islam
(31) Dieudonné Backers Hack French Jewish Websites in "Operation Triple
Quenelle" by The Jewish Daily Forward
(32) Exclusive: Dieudonné Breaks Silence On Quenelle by Sky News
(33) An Act Of Cruelty: An Audience With Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, The
Man Behind The Quenelle Salute by John Lichfield, The Independent
(34) France Intensifies Crackdown On Comic Dieudonné by The Global Post
(35) Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala: French Quenelle Comedian Banned From UK by
Kim Willsher In Paris
(35a) All In The Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots And The
Coreligionists Who Brought Him To Power by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes
Black [...]

Posted by Mask Of Zion at 5:57 AM